Executive Order 62 and state large-load policy
Retained with current thresholds, permit scope and the separate PSC cost-allocation proceeding.
Material from the prior public homepage was reassessed against current records and either carried forward, corrected, moved to context or retired from the current data layer.
Retained with current thresholds, permit scope and the separate PSC cost-allocation proceeding.
Retained as a distinct connected action, separate from electric transmission.
Retained as a regional benchmark with current water permits separated from possible future data-center capacity.
Retained through a contract ledger rather than a stale single program total.
Moved to the context page and rewritten as sourced current status rather than a predetermined narrative.
Retained in a technical brief that distinguishes limits, action levels, monitoring and response duties.
Changed from a moratorium being drafted to an enacted moratorium with active advisory materials.
Changed from active SEQR review to Final EIS accepted, major permits issued and vertical construction underway.
Changed from never built to under construction, based on current county records.
Changed from non-enforceable to the precise distinction: action levels are not numeric effluent limits, but confirmed exceedances trigger permit duties.
Combined power, water and wastewater estimates are no longer displayed as verified totals when their inputs use different phases or assumptions.
Changed from an online-capacity assertion to company-reported gross and critical IT pipeline capacity with current contracted capacity kept separate.
Claims about likely defense use, target concentration and shared single points of failure were not supported by the reviewed record.
Support, opposition and moral conclusions were removed from the data layer. Engineering performance and source records remain.
The 1,136,000 ng/L PFAS calculation is preserved only as a labeled prior-site claim, not as an agency projection or permit limit.